Mandatory Detention

mandatory detentionThe first thing that a deportation officer will do when a non-citizen arrives at a detention center, into the custody of ICE, is to determine whether or not to grant a bond. A bond allows the detainee to pay a certain amount of money in order to be released from custody and return to their home in the United States while removal proceedings continue. If the detainee misses any of their scheduled hearings, they will lose all of their bond money.
 

Mandatory Detention 1 “Very professional law firm. We had a difficult issue and Mr. Shusterman’s office got right onto the case and resolved the issue with USCIS. Because of their efforts, me and my family were able to get our Legal Permanent Residency card. My suggestion to those trying to obtain an employment based card. Don’t look for a money saving attorney. They will cost you lot more in long run. Go to a law firm which is professional and knowledgeable. It pays in the long term.” (More client reviews…)

Schedule Consultation

Skype Consultations Available!Mandatory Detention 2

 

Unfortunately, many noncitizens do not qualify for bonds, even if they are willing to pay. (Immigration and Nationality Act or I.N.A. § 236(c).) Immigration laws mandate that noncitizens are to be detained by ICE even after being released from criminal custody, and that they remain in a detention center while removal proceedings are still pending. This is true at any point after being released, even if the detainee was not taken in upon immediate release from criminal custody. In such a case, the possibility of a bond is not even considered. The detainee remains in ICE custody during removal proceedings under all circumstances, regardless of immigration status or personal reasons.
Mandatory detention is warranted, only under the following circumstances:

  • The detainee was released from criminal custody after October 8, 1998.
  • The detainee’s release from criminal custody was one that requires mandatory detention (listed below).

An actual conviction is not required for a mandatory detention. As long as there is sufficient evidence to prove that a person “committed” a crime, ICE is required to maintain custody of them.

  • A crime involving moral turpitude (unless the maximum sentence possible is one year or less and the actual sentence you received is less than six months OR if you were under 18 when you committed the crime and it was more than five years ago).
  • Multiple convictions where the aggregate sentence is five years or more of imprisonment.
  • A controlled substance offense (any drug offense, including if the immigration authorities have reason to believe that you are a drug trafficker).
  • A prostitution-related offense.
  • Terrorist activity (committed or planned).
  • Significant human trafficking.
  • Money laundering.
    • ICE custody is also required for people who face removal proceedings based on their criminal record of convicted cases, including:

  • A crime involving moral turpitude where (as an added requirement from I.N.A. Section 236(c)(1)(C)), you were sentenced to more than one year in prison.
  • Two or more crimes involving moral turpitude.
  • An aggravated felony.
  • A firearms offense.
  • A controlled substance conviction other than a single offense for possession for your own use of 30 grams or less of marijuana.
  • Drug abuse or addiction.
  • Espionage, sabotage, or treason.

There are only a few people with criminal records who do not face mandatory detention, most of whom are people whose criminal convictions are not included in the list above, for example, any minor crime or DUI charge. In addition, any non-citizens aiding law enforcement authorities are exceptions to mandatory detention rules, if they can convince the Immigration Judge that their release does not pose a threat to anyone or anything and that they will be present for every scheduled court hearing. However, this is an extremely rare exception.
If the detainee feels as though they were unjustly detained, either because they were released from criminal custody before October 8, 1998 or because they do not believe that they fall under one of the detention requirements listed above, they can request the Immigration Judge for what is known as a “Joseph Hearing.”
During the hearing, the judge will reassess the detainee’s criminal history and determine whether the mandatory detention was justified. If the judge determines that you do not fall under the category requiring detention, he or she may consider the detainee for a bond. The judge, however, reserves the right to refuse to grant a bond. Therefore, it is necessary for a detainee to submit evidence on why they deserve to receive a bond. Evidence can include, but is not limited to, proof of family ties, family dependency, and employment history.

Other Mandatory Detention Reasoures

  • IMMIGRATION DETENTION AND REMOVAL: A Guide for Detainees and Their Families
  • Online Detainee Locator System
  • Detention and Deportation Officers Field Manual
  • Over 100 Years of Immigration Experience Working for You

    arvo rating shusterman law v2Best Lawyers in America Carl Shusterman Law
    Super Lawyers Shusterman LawLexis Nexis Peer Review Rated Shusterman Law

    What Can We Help You With - Videos

    Senate Testimony

    Green Cards through Employment

    Green Card through Marriage

     

    View More Videos


    Rate this page: