Cuando usted asiste a una audiencia de deportación o expulsión ante un Juez de Inmigración, asegúrese de que usted entra en la sala acompañado por un abogado de inmigración con experiencia y conocimiento.
¿Porque?
Debido a que el gobierno estará representado por un abogado que probablemente ha aparecido en cientos o incluso miles de las audiencias. (Lo sé. Yo sirvi una vez como un abogado litigante del INS) Si su abogado no está bien informado o no tiene experiencia, usted estará en una desventaja clara.
Hay demasiadas personas que aparecen en sus audiencias de deportación sin tomarse el tiempo de encontrar el mejor abogado de inmigración y experimentan con quien los representen. En su lugar, buscan un abogado barato o, peor aún, aparecen sin un abogado. Esta es una receta para el desastre. ¿Por qué? Debido a que usted está creando un registro ante el Juez de Inmigración. Si pierdes, y luego contratas a un abogado nuevo y decide apelar la decisión del juez, se le carga con el registro de los procedimientos que usted, o su abogado barato, creo ante el Juez.
El expediente del proceso consiste en la transcripción de la audiencia y las exposiciones, incluidas las copias de las solicitudes presentadas en su nombre. Si usted no hace un buen registro ante el Juez, puede ser difícil para su nuevo abogado que gane su apelación.
La Junta de Apelaciones de Inmigración (BIA) se encuentra en Falls Church, Virginia. El BIA no ve ni oye de usted. Ellos sólo ven el registro impreso, la decisión del Juez de Inmigración, y escritos de los abogados. Si el BIA deciden en su contra y finalmente decide contratar a un abogado de inmigración ideal para llevar su caso a la Corte Federal, el tribunal debe basarse en el registro de los procedimientos. Nunca tienen la oportunidad de testificar en la corte.
Con esto en mente, el uso de la información contenida en los siguientes artículos y enlaces le ayudarán a evitar la deportación, y convertirse en un residente permanente de los Estados Unidos.
Client Reviews
A Life Changing Law Firm
“My family and I were clients of Mr. Carl Shusterman and I can honestly say that he had a tremendous impact on our lives – a very positive one. Even when my parents had been denied and they had been told to pack and get out of this country, Mr. Shusterman rushed to find an alternative in order to ensure that my parents could stay.”
- Diana Cabrera, Reno, Nevada
Read More Reviews
Zoom Consultations Available!
Esta pagina ésta dividia en las siguientes subtemas:
- Historias de Exito
- Videos Sobre la Deportación
- Alivio de Deportacion
- ICE/INS Notas de los Fiscales Discreción
- Ejecución de la Ley Inmigratoria
- Cancelación de Deportación: Estudios
- Suspensión Equitatiav
- Delitos Criminales
- Detencion
- Oficina Ejecutiva Para Revision de Casos de Inmigracion (EOIR)
- Tribunales de Inmigracion
- Junta de Apelaiciones (BIA)
- Tribunales Federales
- Oficina Ejecutiva de Revision (OCAHO)
HISTORIAS DE ÉXITO
VIDEOS SOBRE LA DEPORTACIÓN (En Ingles)
- Winning Your Case in Immigration Court
- Cancellation of Removal for Non-Permanent Residents
- Asylum: Winning Your Case
ALIVIO DE DEPORTACIÓN
- Notice to Individuals Granted Immigration Benefits by Immigration Judge or Board of Immigration Appeals (USCIS)
- Supreme Court Holds That Right to Habeas Corpus Preserved For Persons Challenging Orders of Removal (6-25-01)
- Adjudicating Requests for Stays at the Board of Immigration Appeals
- How To Avoid Deportation
- Practice Advisory: Seeking Post-Conviction Relief under Padilla v. Kentucky after Chaidez v. US (2-28-13)
- Winning Your Case in Immigration Court
- Grounds of Inadmissiblity and Waivers (State Department)
- Share of Immigration Cases Ending in Deportation Orders Hits Record Low (TRAC) (2-07-12)
- Practice Advisory: Implications of Judalang v. Holder for LPRs Seeking Relief from Deportation (12-16-11)
- Attorney General Vacates Compean Order (6-03-09)
- Attorney General Holder Reverses “No Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel” Decision (6-03-09)
- Immigration Benefits in EOIR Removal Proceedings (USCIS)
- Notice to Individuals Granted Immigration Benefits by Immigration Judge or Board of Immigration Appeals (USCIS)
- Fact Sheet – DHS Procedures for Implementation of EOIR Background Checks Regulations for Aliens Seeking Relief from Removal (8-08-06)
- Immigration Judge Marks’ Comments to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (June 2006)
- Jama v. ICE – Supreme Court Upholds Law Which Permits Alien to be Removed to Country Without that Country’s Advanced Consent (1-13-05)
- Morales v. Izquierdo v. Ashcroft – 9th Circuit Appeals Court Voids INS Re-Instatement of Removal Rules (11-18-04)
- EOIR Press Release: Final 212(c) Regulations (9-29-04)
- Final 212(c) Regulations (9-28-04)
- Forms of Relief From Removal – EOIR (8-03-04)
- Calcano-Martinez vs. INS: Supreme Court Holds That Right to Habeas Corpus Preserved For Persons Challenging Orders of Removal (6-25-01)
- BIA Defines “Exceptional And Extremely Unusual Hardship” For Purposes Of Cancellation of Removal in Matter Of Monreal
- EOIR Regulation Regarding §212(c) Relief (1-22-01)
- Adjudicating Requests for Stays at the Board of Immigration Appeals
- How To Avoid Deportation
- Winning Your Case in Immigration Court
- Grounds of Inadmissiblity and Waivers (State Department)
- Share of Immigration Cases Ending in Deportation Orders Hits Record Low (TRAC) (2-07-12)
- Practice Advisory: Implications of Judalang v. Holder for LPRs Seeking Relief from Deportation (12-16-11)
- Attorney General Vacates Compean Order (6-03-09)
- Attorney General Holder Reverses “No Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel” Decision (6-03-09)
- Immigration Benefits in EOIR Removal Proceedings (USCIS)
- Notice to Individuals Granted Immigration Benefits by Immigration Judge or Board of Immigration Appeals (USCIS)
- Fact Sheet – DHS Procedures for Implementation of EOIR Background Checks Regulations for Aliens Seeking Relief from Removal (8-08-06)
- Immigration Judge Marks’ Comments to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (June 2006)
- Jama v. ICE – Supreme Court Upholds Law Which Permits Alien to be Removed to Country Without that Country’s Advanced Consent (1-13-05)
- Morales v. Izquierdo v. Ashcroft – 9th Circuit Appeals Court Voids INS Re-Instatement of Removal Rules (11-18-04)
- EOIR Press Release: Final 212(c) Regulations (9-29-04)
- Final 212(c) Regulations (9-28-04)
- Forms of Relief From Removal – EOIR (8-03-04)
- Calcano-Martinez vs. INS: Supreme Court Holds That Right to Habeas Corpus Preserved For Persons Challenging Orders of Removal (6-25-01)
- BIA Defines “Exceptional And Extremely Unusual Hardship” For Purposes Of Cancellation of Removal in Matter Of Monreal
- EOIR Regulation Regarding §212(c) Relief (1-22-01)
- Adjudicating Requests for Stays at the Board of Immigration Appeals
ICE/INS NOTAS DE DISCRECIÓN DE LOS FISCALES (En Ingles)
- ICE Prosecutorial Discretion Initiative: Latest Figures (4-19-12)
- Guidance to ICE Attorneys Reviewing the CBP, USCIS, and ICE Cases Before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (11-17-11)
- USCIS Policy Memorandum Regarding Case-by-Case Review of Incoming and Certain Pending Cases (11-17-11)
- USCIS Policy Memorandum Regarding Issuances of NTA’s in Cases Involving Inadmissible and Removable Aliens (11-7-11)
- AIC Practice Advisory: “DHS Review of Low Priority Cases For Prosecutorial Discretion” (9-1-11)
- Obama Policy is Not Amnesty (8-20-11)
- DHS Announces Expansion of Prosecutorial Discretion Guidelines (8-18-11)
- Deportation Halted for Younger Immigrants (8-18-11)
- Congressman Gutierrez Calls DHS Deportation Announcement a Major Victory (8-18-11)
- Napolitano Letter to Senators (8-18-11)
- Morton Prosecutorial Discretion Memo (6-17-11)
- Practice Advisory: Motions to Suppress in Removal Proceedings: A General Overview- Legal Action Center (5-31-11)
- Understanding Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Law – Immigration Policy Center
- Immigration Policy Center: Reading the Morton Memo-Federal Priorities and Prosecutorial Discretion (12-06-10)
- Prosecutorial Discretion: How to get DHS to Act in Favor of Your Client (11-20-10) – AIC Practice Advisory
- ICE Removal Proceedings Memo (8-20-10)
- Julie L. Myers, Prosecutorial and Custody Discretion Memo (11-7-07)
- William J. Howard, Prosecutorial Discretion Memo (10-24-05)
- INS Fact Sheet On Prosecutorial Discretion
- Doris Meissner, Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion Memo (11-17-00)
- INS Memorandum Regarding Prosecutorial Discretion
EJECCUCIÓN DE LA LEY INMIGRATORIA (En Ingles)
- Ban on Illegal Workers is Hard to Enforce (NPR) – 2-17-04
- Office of Immigration Litigation Immigration Litigation Bulletin (Office of Immigration Litigation)
- TRAC – INS (Provides Comprehensive Independent Information About INS Enforcement)
Cancelación de Deportación: Estudios (En Ingles)
- Cabrera Family Wins Right to Remain in the U.S. (2007)
- VICTORY! Judge’s Decision Granting the Cabreras’ Application for Cancellation of Removal (January 18, 2007)
- Court Order Granting Respondent’s Motion to Remand (April 11, 2005)
- Respondent’s Motion to Remand (February 9, 2005)
- BIA Dismisses Motion to Reconsider (June 18, 2004)
- Federal Court Grants Stay of Removal and Denies Government’s Motion to Dismiss (May 20, 2004)
- Government’s Motion to Dismiss (January 16, 2004)
- Private Bill Introduced in Senate – S. 1985 (December 9, 2003)
- Private Bill Introduced in House of Representatives – H.R. 3700 (December 8, 2003)
- Immigration Policy Becomes Family Matter – LA Times (October 27, 2003)
- Immigration Judge’s Decision & BIA Reversal
Suspensión Equitativa (En Ingles)
- Mejia-Hernandez vs. Holder (9th Cir. 2011)
- Singh v. Gonzales (9th Cir. 2007)
- Albillo-De Leon v. Gonzales (9th Cir. 2005)
- Fajardo vs. INS (9th Cir. 2002)
- Socop-Gonzalez v. INS – En Banc (9th Cir. 2001)
- Jobe vs. INS – 238 F.3d 96 – En Banc (1st Cir. 2001)
- Varela vs. INS – 204 F.3d 1237 (9th Cir. 2000)
- Lopez vs. INS – 184 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir. 1999)
Decades of Immigration Experience Working for You
What Can We Help You With - Videos
Winning Your Case in Immigration Court
Green Cards through Employment
Green Card through Marriage
Carl Shusterman
Carl Shusterman served as an INS Trial Attorney (1976-82) before opening a firm specializing exclusively in US immigration law. He is a Certified Specialist in Immigration Law who has testified as an expert witness before the US Senate Immigration Subcommittee. Carl was featured in the February 2018 edition of SuperLawyers Magazine.