U.S. IMMIGRATION, FRAUD WAIVERS: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
(Law Offices of Carl Shusterman)
FRAUD WAIVERS:
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
|
FREE NEWSLETTER
|
|
Learn how to benefit from United States immigration
laws and procedures from a former INS Attorney (1976-82) with over
30 years of experience.
SHUSTERMAN'S
IMMIGRATION UPDATE is must reading for potential
immigrants, employers, human resources managers,
immigration attorneys, reporters and policy makers.
Join over 55,000 persons in more than 150 countries
in subscribing to our FREE monthly e-mail newsletter.
|
|
1. What is a fraud waiver?
A fraud waiver is a benefit which allows certain persons who have committed an immigration
fraud or material misrepresentation to obtain a visa or green card despite their transgression.
Specifically, it can waive the ground of excludability or inadmissibility for fraud or material
misrepresentation. This ground applies to people who, by fraud or by willfully misrepresenting
a material fact, have sought to procure, seek to procure, or have procured a visa, other
documentation or entry (admission) into the U.S., or other benefit under the immigration laws.
The following are examples of fraud or misrepresentation:
- Using a false name, birth date, marital status to obtain a visa, an extension or
change of status or adjustment of status.
- Falsely claiming to be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident on an I-9 form to
obtain employment.
2. How could someone qualify for the waiver before the new law?
There were two ways to qualify for the waiver before the new law changed this section on
September 30, 1996:
- If the intending immigrant or immigrant who was the spouse, parent, or son or
daughter of a United States citizen (USC) or lawful permanent resident (LPR);
or
- If the fraud or misrepresentation occurred at least 10 years before the date of
the immigrant's application for a visa, entry or adjustment of status, and
admission of the immigrant would not be contrary to the interests of the United
States.
3. Is the fraud waiver still available under the new law?
Yes, but it has been greatly restricted.
4. How does the new law restrict the availability of the fraud waiver?
A section in the new law (section 349) changed the availability of the waiver in three
ways:
- It eliminated the 10-year "statute of limitations" option. Thus, the only way to
obtain a fraud waiver is through a family relationship;
- It eliminates the word "parent" from the list of people who can qualify for a
fraud waiver. This means that only spouses or sons or daughters of USCs or LPRs
are eligible for the waiver. Parents of a USC or LPR no longer can obtain this
waiver (perhaps Congress did not want people to "benefit" from giving birth to a
child in the U.S.);
and
- The applicant must establish that the qualifying relative would suffer "extreme
hardship" if the applicant were denied admission or forced to leave the U.S.
5. So, in summary, under the new law, who can obtain a fraud waiver?
Under the new law, the only people who can obtain a fraud waiver are spouses and sons
and daughters of USCs or LPRs, and only if they show that the qualifying relative would
suffer extreme hardship if the waiver is not granted.
6. What does "extreme hardship" mean in this context?
The statute does not define the term, but presumably it means the same as it did in
the suspension of deportation context.
7. Are there any other restrictions in the new law about this waiver?
Yes. The new law also states that "no court shall have jurisdiction to review a decision
or action of the Attorney General regarding this waiver."
If this preclusion is valid -- and it may be subject to challenge in the courts -- it means that
there is no court review. It does not limit or restrict administrative review by the Board of Immigration Appeals.
8. When are these changes effective and do they apply to pending cases?
The new law does not include an effective date and does not indicate that Congress
intended it to apply to pending cases. It is often said that where a statute does
not express an effective date, it is effective upon enactment. However, even if this
is true, that does not answer the second question: whether the changes made apply to
pending cases or applications.
Under Supreme Court law, a new statute that restricts relief or has other negative
consequences should not apply to pending cases unless Congress clearly indicated its
intent that it should.
Here, where Congress did not communicate an intent that the new law restrictions apply
to pending cases and applications, arguably they should not.
9. Does that mean my application for the fraud waiver may go ahead under the old law without the "hardship" requirement?
Arguably, yes. However, we can anticipate that the INS will not agree with this interpretation, but will argue that the statute is effective immediately and applies to all pending cases and applications.

Schedule A Legal Consultation
Return to Analysis of 1996 Immigration Law
Return to Immigration Guide Homepage